11:11 AM 2018-11-05 via http://fapinfo.org/conact/ I have plenty of space here to describe the issues at hand. This message is directed to Jennifer Brehme for her direct attention to these matters. First off, I have to describe my complete disappointment that you keep placing statement of spin or emphasis and facts that are not true. How can I be any more direct than the provided email address that I am using in this "contact" FAP submission? I have my own copy of this text just for prosperity purposes should I need such a reference in court. Let's describe the events that happened With Guerrmo. First off, I have an agenda of correction that has been throughout my interface with Foothill Aids Project. I describe events that happened to me in Denver. I also provide a copy of the Doctor Howard Newsom Letter to be part of my intake resolution in my needs. Doctor Howard Newsom was the former Mental Health Program Director of Foothill Aids Project when I was getting services in 2007. He writes it plain and to the point reference. It can't be misunderstood or denied access of this resolution. This letter is so toxic to this conspiracy that is involved here but so relevant to the actual mental health of this client. I presented this letter when I moved to San Diego country and this letter was ignored. I presented this letter when I moved to Denver and placed myself in client services with Colorado Health Network aka Denver Colorado Aids Project. This letter was ignored. This letter was a service that was provided by Foothill Aids Project after I put into reference the true events that happened in Oakland California with social services. Doctor Newsom and I discussed the possibility that those who were targeting me were criminal and maybe a part of the mafia. I am not kidding. They were placing hate and harassment communications from online sources into my life before the Cyber-Bullying Hate Laws were enacted. This letter serves to function to prevent housing loss when?if that element of our society re-targets me. Which in Denver they did. Now, you can defend your collective agency side of this,, by ignoring the letter from Doctor Howard and also not communicating properly with this client, skewing the true events to a spin that would service your justification to not provide services. What you would be defending is a "criminal enterprise" of hate that I encountered both in Oakland and In Denver. Is that really the way that you want to be perceived by the jury who will take this in account and rule in favor of responsibility. The letter from Doctor Howard concludes: "His mental health and HIV health state were both clinically affected by his housing crisis in Oakland and here in San Bernardino. He is currently responding well to the treatments and his prognosis is good. However, I [ Doctor Howard Newsom ] believe that until there is an appropriate resolution (he wants an absolution) of his housing conflicts, he will remain in a vulnerable state regarding his overall HIV and Mental Health status." I just noticed something about your website in that you are not following https:// standards meaning client communications such as this is could be monitored. But then again, I am cross reference posting these documentations to my own "file directory" style web domains which of course also does not contain https:// and is not required. Doctor Howard Newsom's letter is filed in full by accessing this URL, which by namespace reference follows the standard established by the professional's and the world's most popular social media site of LinkedIn. Where on Linkedin Companies who have registered public records are all visible on site and employees can match their job experiences to company data records. What this means is that company names are placed on site because of public filing on this namespace. They are not just created out of the user base., This is similar to what happens on Facebook with Business company names/addresses to create a business listing. I am doing nothing wrong by having this namespace referenced domain. It is up to you to know that the name reference means there is NO OPT OUT of this networking presence. IF you want to create a "content removal request", you may do so with any of the referenced email addresses that I have issued and provided to you. But you are not willing to participate in such a network presence. Once again with a little more detail, this networking presence is toxic to a criminal conspiracy that is occurring in the Ryan White Care Act social service non-profit field agencies nationally systemic. I am not particularly focused on one single entity. Therefore, I am not harassing you but detailing to the record the events showing a huge argument that I will be putting to a court trial if necessary. What happens to the content under my domains makes it go viral instead of negotiation reconciliation. That is not really the best outcome, but if you choose to remain silent, per Plato's standard statement, you give consent to proceed in such way. Doctor Howard's letter is filed: http://foothillaidsproject.fuckeduphuman.net/MentalHealthAdvocacyLetterJan2007.jpg With a little client presentation flare version: http://foothillaidsproject.fuckeduphuman.net/MentalHealthAdvocacyLetterJan2007-LoudCryingFace.png The events in Denver 2015/2016/2017 mirror the events in Oakland 2005/2006. Now once again, the standard of namespace referenced on LinkedIn is found in this image: http://webdomains.realuphuman.net/linkedin.com/Standards-Fuck-In-Company-Names.png Now while we are it here in providing namespaces: Base Reference Content History of Client Provided Reality of Happenings [ Documented in Real Time of Events ]: http://foothillaidsproject.fuckeduphuman.net http://foothillaidsproject.fuckeduphuman.net/Staff/ with its Denver History counterparts: http://coloradohealthnetwork.fuckeduphuman.net http://rockymountaincares.fuckeduphuman.net http://pillarpropertyllc.fuckeduphuman.net http://chesneykleinjohnapartements.fuckeduphuman.net Also on record, is this namespace in the name of my former case manager, http://angelaelizabethkeady.fuckeduphuman.net giving that I already have case managers noted at this domain namespace, I have also provided such cross referencing to the Foothill Aids Projects involvements: http://michael-ray-maynard.fuckeduphuman.net http://jennifer-anne-brehme.fuckeduphuman.net and some other agency interfaced involvements: http://desertaidsproject.fuckeduphuman.net http://cascadeaidsproject.fuckeduphuman.net Once again, following LinkedIn established namespace standards, there is absolutely nothing illegal, harassing, or wrong with this namespace referenced on our information society as such I have ownership of my own words, and the intentional placement of my case open to the public record documented in most possible ways in the real time of events happening. You all are going to challenge this data record of my memory of these events. Everything there is timestamped, you know. This conspiracy involving the Ryan White Care act is getting rather old and tiresome to deal with one-to-agency. It is time to get a court magistrate involved if I cannot break this conspiracy by a status of impasse. You all are criminal, neglectful of your duty to country, treasonous to our country, and should be placed in jail for what will be the filing and court case of the century. There is still time to create a resolution reconcillation by following the words of Doctor Howard Newsom and following the words of Pope Francis Call to our nation in front of Congress Sept 2015 and following #WordsToLiveBy, circa 1750s in numerous citation publication references in chapters of the secrets to happiness and I classify these words a standard of excellence. Is that not a better choice that complete collapse which is happening little erosion hour glass sand grain by grain falling from the top to the bottom as your time is up. @Gruwup 2016 Great Reasons Us ( You There, I Here, and all visiting guests and students of learning here along with Pope Francis ) Will Unite Peace [ ... ] , [ ... ] , [ ... ] Awesome Kramobone Glows and Blows Playroom : Denver Colorado : United States of America [ ... ] , [ ... ] , [ ... ] From his private meeting with President Obama to giving the first-ever papal address before a joint session of Congress, Pope Francis did not shy away from politics during his three-day stop in Washington, D.C. (Julie Percha/The Washington Post) An excerpt from his public address broadcast worldwide live to which this author here was watching and listening to him intently . He said to the world to what I agree has been a part of my missing portion of my mission work ideal - I have no fix for this and I cannot totally be in this community work alone. This is what he told or asked or advised us to do: [ ... ] , [ ... ] , [ ... ] ------ All of us are quite aware of, and deeply worried by, the disturbing social and political situation of the world today. Our world is increasingly a place of violent conflict, hatred and brutal atrocities, committed even in the name of God and of religion. We know that no religion is immune from forms of individual delusion or ideological extremism. This means that we must be especially attentive to every type of fundamentalism, whether religious or of any other kind. A delicate balance is required to combat violence perpetrated in the name of a religion, an ideology or an economic system, while also safeguarding religious freedom, intellectual freedom and individual freedoms. But there is another temptation which we must especially guard against: the simplistic reductionism which sees only good or evil; or, if you will, the righteous and sinners. The contemporary world, with its open wounds which affect so many of our brothers and sisters, demands that we confront every form of polarization which would divide it into these two camps. We know that in the attempt to be freed of the enemy without, we can be tempted to feed the enemy within. To imitate the hatred and violence of tyrants and murderers is the best way to take their place. That is something which you, as a people, reject. Our response must instead be one of hope and healing, of peace and justice. We are asked to summon the courage and the intelligence to resolve today’s many geopolitical and economic crises. Even in the developed world, the effects of unjust structures and actions are all too apparent. Our efforts must aim at restoring hope, righting wrongs, maintaining commitments, and thus promoting the well-being of individuals and of peoples. We must move forward together, as one, in a renewed spirit of fraternity and solidarity, cooperating generously for the common good. The challenges facing us today call for a renewal of that spirit of cooperation, which has accomplished so much good throughout the history of the United States. The complexity, the gravity and the urgency of these challenges demand that we pool our resources and talents, and resolve to support one another, with respect for our differences and our convictions of conscience. http://jennifer-anne-brehme.community.gruwup.net/Words-To-Live-By Art thou dejected? Is thy mind o'ercast? To chase thy gloom, Go fix some weighty truth; Chain down some passion; do some generous good; Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile; Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe; Be just in all things; make amends For follies past, and, with warm heart, Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate, And then thy counsels will be strong, Thy reprimands avail. ANON THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a plain unvarnished tale. -------------- We are in a state of impasse. You are dejected. To Chase your gloom and doom, it would be best to follow these words of guidance for a change. It is up to you whether or not you want to hold onto a parameter of conspiracy that is showing on Glassdoor with this now recent review of Colorado Health Network: https://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Employee-Review-Colorado-Health-Network-RVW23177216.htm Oct 29, 2018 "Stay Away" Former Employee - Medical Case Manager in Colorado Springs, CO Doesn't Recommend Negative Outlook CEO I worked at Colorado Health Network full-time (More than 5 years) Pros This unfortunately is a area that there is nothing to promote as there are no Pros to this job. Cons EEOC violations, confidentiality compromises of the people they are suppossed to protect, pay is below average and benefits are horrible. The CEO is below the bottom of the swamp in regards to leadership. ---- [ This one from Earlier --- As this statement below applies to clients --- get to know clients better ]------ https://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Employee-Review-Colorado-Health-Network-RVW19297423.htm Feb 17, 2018 Helpful (1) "If you don’t gossip like a teenager, you’ll be an outsider." Former Employee - Anonymous Employee Doesn't Recommend Neutral Outlook I worked at Colorado Health Network full-time Pros The mission at CHN is good. Cons Very caddy work environment for the most part. Advice to Management Get to know employees better ------ The First Glassdoor Employee Review appears 2 weeks to the day that I left Denver to come home to San Bernardino. It is upon you all to do the right thing here -- or we go to court and you will lose the argument of holding any justification for this conspiracy that is a memeplex working across the entire Ryan White Care Act field of social service non-profits -- at least the original set of agencies. https://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Employee-Review-Colorado-Health-Network-RVW16120377.htm Jul 28, 2017 Helpful (3) "Low pay, oppressive managment, dishonest business practices..." Current Employee - Anonymous Employee Doesn't Recommend Negative Outlook I have been working at Colorado Health Network full-time (Less than a year) Pros Brand new facility, friendly coworkers, easy access to downtown. Interviews are too easy. Great benefits. Benefits those less fortunate. Cons Oppressive leadership, disingenuous management, dishonest business practices. I really wan to like this place but the management could use some training. I have witnessed some dishonest business practices going on here. Toxic work environment. Pay is very low. Upper level management is very elitist, discriminating, and oppressive toward other staff. Advice to Management Take some training courses to learn how to perform your job better. Many may have landed in their current positions due to the Peter Principle. Do some house cleaning, see who actually contributes to the successful functioning of the company and trim the fat. Just because someone is fun outside of work and makes you laugh does not mean they are competent managers that need to be leading other people. Take a look in the mirror. This glassdoor review for Cascade Aids Project details this memeplex conspiracy that is not healing the community but actually harming the HIV Community and the greater society culture at large: https://www.glassdoor.ca/Reviews/Employee-Review-Cascade-AIDS-Project-RVW8041978.htm [ This Glassdoor Original posting has been censored after I establish a correspondence with the @FBI, they are involved in the cover-up of this conspiracy ] This review remained static on site of Glassdoor for more than 3 years since 2015. it was not until a couple of months ago this review was deleted. 22 Sep, 2015 Helpful (4) "Disappointment and Mendacity" Former Employee - Not Safe to Disclose in Portland, OR (US) Doesn't Recommend Negative Outlook CEO I worked at Cascade AIDS Project full-time (More than a year) Pros The community members living with HIV are some of the most dynamic and resilient people you may ever meet. Working with those who are still suffering profoundly impacts your deeply and personally. CAP has a mostly young vibe and the work is interesting due to its complex nature. Downtown location is convenient. Cons Management is hostile to the union represented staff. The organization only works with a narrow part of the community yet markets something different to look more comprehensive than it is. Much of upper management is threatened by change, is conflict avoidant to the point of dysfunction and is retaliatory when confronted. Often, people with poor skills are promoted to leadership and this creates frustration and a sense of unfairness highlighting backroom agreements meant to undermine. Morale is dreadful. In the past few years most staff have been fired, pressured to leave, or asked to work with compromised ethics. Gay, black, HIV+, and trans identified staff have been systematically marginalized. CAP treated HIV+ staff as second class citizens, ignored client request for change, and silences critics. If you go against CAP, even if justified, you will find it hard to work in the HIV community in Portland. The board is completely distant from the staff and the clients being served, and act condescending and unhelpful. You would think if 50% of the staff leave in a few months time, it might be a wake up call that there are big problems that can't be dismissed as "disgruntled" staff. Since CAP is the only game in town for HIV related needs, they have no checks and balances and no accountability when they injure the community they are claiming they serve. Show Less Advice to Management Stop displaying images and raising money through deception. Admit you do not serve the community at large and close your doors. CAP is not about HIV anymore, it's about retaining jobs and keeping people working at the expense of programing and directives that empower. If you want to be a LGBTQ health center then so be it, but do not pretend you are helping people living with HIV, because you are not. You are only focusing on addicts and the mentally ill. Also, an LGBTQ health group or HIV group with no gay or HIV+ leaders, or people of color managing direct services means you will be just like any other colonized public health care model that delivers incompetent care. The community does not need public health zombies, we have them already. We also do not need tokenized minorities to cover for the heteronormative, white, middle class faux professionalism that is the root of the HIV pandemic to begin with, and abundantly present in CAP management's ranks. There is a big problem when the public adores you and your clients and the community you claim to serve would rather go without then be at the mercy of a place they distrust and dislike. ---- NOTEWORTHY IS THAT SAN BERNARDINO SHOOTING IN MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE BELOW: THE JURY WILL HAVE A FIELD DAY CHEWING THIS CONCLUSION UP TO THE POINT REFERENCE OF THIS HATE MEMEPLEX WORKING AGAINST CLIENTS: https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/how-the-erosion-of-trust-leads-to-murders-and-mass-shootings/2017/10/06/382cc4b2-a91e-11e7-92d1-58c702d2d975_story.html How the erosion of trust leads to murders and mass shootings A makeshift memorial to those killed by Stephen Paddock at the Route 91 Harvest Festival in Las Vegas. (Matt McClain/The Washington Post) By Randolph Roth Randolph Roth is a professor of history and sociology at Ohio State University and the author of “American Homicide.” October 6, 2017 When society is functioning well, we should, at the very least, be able to trust that the people around us won't try to kill us. And yet, after a mass shooting, we may wonder. We may worry in the subsequent days and weeks as we send our kids off to school, ride public transportation to work, join the crowd at a concert, settle into the pews at church. For some people, that fear may mean avoiding certain places, at least for a time. For others, it means arming themselves in defense. After the 2015 shooting in San Bernardino, Calif., gun sales spiked most in the immediate vicinity, suggesting that safety concerns, more than concerns about potential changes to gun laws, drove those purchases. But while we all know from experience that shootings can lead to faltering trust, the reverse appears to be true as well. My research has found that declining trust in our institutions, our social structures and one another leads to more lethal violence, including mass murder. As abstract as these sentiments may seem, they predispose certain people to kill. In fact, they explain homicide rates better than any other factor, including unemployment, guns, drugs or a permissive justice system. When we lose faith in our government and political leaders, when we lack a sense of kinship with others, when we feel we just can't get a fair shake, it affects the confidence with which we go about our lives. Small disagreements, indignities and disappointments that we might otherwise brush off may enrage us — generating hostile, defensive and predatory emotions — and in some cases give way to violence. This may be rooted in our biology. Primate studies have shown that apes and monkeys secrete more of the hormones that cause or facilitate aggression, and less of the hormones that deter aggression, when their tribes experience political instability, faction fighting and struggles for dominance. People who suffer from dangerous forms of mental illness, who have experienced severe reversals in their lives or who have suicidal thoughts are most vulnerable when these feelings course through society, as Adam Lankford describes in "The Myth of Martyrdom." They are more likely to lash out, as we have seen in case after case of mass murder. Some mass killers have written manifestos detailing their grievances with the U.S. government. Yet the relationship between trust and homicide is seldom so explicit. Everyday murderers don't stop to cite distrust of government or their fellow citizens as a reason they killed. Few homicides are motivated directly by political conflict or political feelings, anyway. But the link between trust in government and homicide rates is evident everywhere, across centuries. In England, for instance, 60,000 voting rights demonstrators gathered in Manchester in 1819 to demand the right to elect their own representatives in Parliament. They were viciously attacked by militiamen on horseback wielding sabers. Eleven people were killed outright; countless others were wounded. The homicide rate in England and Wales doubled over the next five years, and it remained high throughout the years of agitation for voting rights. But when the Second Reform Act passed in 1867, enfranchising propertyless household heads in urban areas, the homicide rate fell suddenly by half; and when the Third Reform Act passed in 1884, enfranchising propertyless household heads in rural areas, the rate fell suddenly by half again. Empowerment, inclusion and faith in government mattered. The same patterns appear throughout American history. Homicide rates (which primarily reflect violence between unrelated adults and do not include war casualties) dropped dramatically after the revolution, as the new nation developed institutions in which people could put their faith and as Americans developed a sense of patriotism and belonging. By the early 19th century, although murder remained more common on the contested frontiers and in the slave-holding South, the North and the mountainous regions of the South — from Appalachia to the Ozarks — had some of the lowest homicide rates in the world. (About 3 per 100,000 persons per year, which is low even by today's standards and considering their lack of modern medicine.) That changed when reverence for political leaders declined in the wake of the Mexican War and homicide rates doubled or tripled — 15 years before the Civil War and Reconstruction made things worse. We can measure the inverse relationship between homicide and trust with more precision in modern times. The murder rate since World War II has tracked almost perfectly, as criminologist Gary LaFree has observed, with the proportion of Americans who say they "trust the government in Washington to do what is right " most of the time and who believe that most public officials are honest. The rate also rises and falls along with answers to surveys asking about the level of trust we have in our neighbors, how safe we feel walking around at night near our homes and how heavily armed we think we need to be. For brief periods during the New Deal, World War II and the early years of the Cold War, things got better: We recaptured our patriotism, our fellow-feeling and our trust in government. But divisions over the civil rights movement and the Vietnam War tore that emerging national consensus apart. The homicide rate peaked for African Americans during the Nixon administration, at 43 per 100,000 persons per year, when their trust in government was at its lowest and their feelings of alienation were highest. And it peaked for white Americans in 1980, at 7 per 100,000 persons annually, when accumulated anger over busing, welfare, affirmative action, defeat in Vietnam and humiliation in Iran boiled over into the Reagan revolution. If we had sustained the high rates that prevailed nationally from the 1970s to the mid-1990s (9 to 10 per 100,000 per year), 1 in every 142 Americans would have been killed, including 1 of every 27 black males. And if we maintain our current, lower rate (5.5 per 100,000 annually), 1 in every 231 Americans will be killed, including 1 of every 38 black males. It has been somewhat harder to see the relationship between trust and homicide in the past decade, because hyperpartisanship has led people to answer polls according to their feelings about the party in power, rather than their feelings about society as a whole. But before the 2008 election, my colleague Michael Maltz and I forecast that if Barack Obama secured the nomination and won the presidency, the homicide rate in America's cities would drop because of what his candidacy would mean to African Americans and other minorities, who live disproportionately in urban areas. We also worried that the homicide rate would rise in the areas of the country most resistant to the idea of an African American president. The subsequent divergence in the nation's homicide rates appeared to bear this out. Counties that were more heavily urban and minority saw their homicide rates decline. But the rates increased sharply in the predominantly white counties concentrated in the upper South — from West Virginia to Arkansas and Oklahoma — that gave less support to Obama than historical voting records and national voting trends would have suggested and that would go on to become the heart of the birther movement. Criminologist Richard Rosenfeld has further suggested that the rise in murders in certain U.S. cities in 2015 is better explained by a loss of trust and a decline in the legitimacy of the justice system than by the heroin epidemic, the (slight) drop in the prison population or supposedly less-aggressive policing after Ferguson. "When persons do not trust the police to act on their behalf and to treat them fairly and with respect, they lose confidence in the formal apparatus of social control and become more likely to take matters into their own hands," Rosenfeld wrote in a 2016 report for the Justice Department. "Lack of confidence in the police among African-Americans predates the recent police killings in Ferguson, Cleveland, New York and elsewhere. But it is likely to be activated by such incidents, transforming longstanding latent grievances into an acute legitimacy crisis." It's cyclical. Loss of trust contributes to the homicides of unarmed black citizens by fearful or angry white police officers, and to the murders of officers by angry blacks, which further diminishes trust between citizens and law enforcement. When trust disappeares, no one's life matters. What might the future hold? Trump's election may lead to a decline in homicide in certain parts of the country, by empowering the white Americans who resent minorities and immigrants most deeply. But most of his support, especially in the Rust Belt, was not based on race. He won because he promised to help middle- and working-class whites economically. If he is unsuccessful, or worse, if his supporters decide he conned them and was interested only in enriching himself and the rest of the nation's economic elite, all bets are off. And given Trump's attacks on the federal government and on rival politicians, his administration's dismissal of Black Lives Matter, the question of how much Russian intervention may have compromised the election, and infringements on voting rights, it is very possible that the homicide rate will continue to rise, especially in the poorest neighborhoods in our cities. Not every mass murderer is driven to kill by these broad historical forces. Some, such as the gunmen in Aurora, Colo., Newtown, Conn., and Tucson , are mentally ill and are copying the violence they see around them. But most mass murderers have been deeply affected by the distrust, disillusionment and enmity that pervade our society. The Oklahoma City bomber was a suicidal white supremacist, angry at a government that had dashed his dream of becoming an Army Ranger and that, in his eyes, cared more about minorities than it did about him. The Orlando shooter, a man so disturbed that he frightened his co-workers, was bitter over his inability to land a job as a police officer. He hated the government, blacks, women and gays, perhaps, as the evidence suggests, because he was confused about his sexuality. The congressional baseball practice shooter blamed politicians and the wealthy for his own and the nation's ills. All these men had difficulty in relationships and were apparently jealous of people who were happy, loved and loving, which is why they targeted ballgames and nightclubs and country music concerts. Their problems were personal. But people with personal problems are infected by our hatreds. We have all played a part in creating them. outlook@washpost.com